Editor, Roberto de Mattei, Edizioni, Cantagalli s.r.l.
The public has the right to know the actual chronology of the dinosaurs, and indeed the history of the earth.
If scientists don’t like the conclusions of the presenters, they should make a case that the underlying data is faulty, instead of censoring it outright.
There are plenty of dinosaur bones out there that could be tested for C-14—one would hope that other researchers will take up the challenge and perform similar analyses to these researchers.
This is an exciting time to be a creationist, both getting this sort of information, and being able to pass it on.
So it’s more important than ever to be not just subscribing to but actively supporting reputable, non-sensationalistic creation organizations committed to this important task. Having submitted abstracts, reviewed abstracts, and having served on the committees that decide what papers get into a symposia (something I doubt Dr. The peer review of papers submitted to symposia is not as stringent as that for papers published in journals.
The numbers go from 4 to 6, omitting 5, which was the one on Two of the report’s physicist co-authors, Professor Dr Robert Bennett and Dr Jean de Pontcharra, till recently with the French Atomic Energy Commission’s Grenoble Research Centre, are urging colleagues to do their own carbon dating of dinosaur bones.